Marxism in The Hairy Ape

In the play, “The Hairy Ape,” Eugene O’Neill presents a sharp division among social classes, which he illustrates by presenting strong contrasts between the world of the ship workers (proletariat) and that of the cruise-goer (bourgeoisie). In Gundrisse, Karl Marx wrote of the necessity to fully understand the significance and impact of the class delineations, he posited that “classes, again are but an empty word unless we know what are the elements on which they are based, such as wage-labor, capital, etc.” (Grundisse, 650). All of the characters representative of wage earners are depicted as base and dirty and struggling with their identity in the shifting modernity of the world in which they find themselves. Initially the character of Yank glories in his role in society, though uneducated and unsophisticated, he realizes that the cruise goers (bourgeoisie) require his labor to continue their pleasure or artificially created world. He takes pride in his role in society and identifies with the material – steel – which gives him both his identity and his value, saying “ I’m de ting in gold dat makes it money! And I’m what makes iron into steel!....And I’m steel-steel-steel! I’m muscles in steel, de punch behind it! (Hairy, 1183) In this passage Yank is giving voice to Marx’s notion that the “the productive activity of the worker, the creative power whereby the worker not only replaces what he consumes, but gives to the accumulated labor a greater value than it previously possessed” (Wage, 663). O’Neill creates a dark and grimy world below the decks of the cruise ship which is portrayed as a prison where the workers are confined not by bars but by the steel that they make . Their workplace is likened to a prison or a cage (confining spaces generally made of steel) from which the workers are unable to escape.
Yank’s character is transformed by an encounter with a representative of the bourgeoise, Mildred Douglas. She represents the artificial, clean and smooth running world above the ship deck, which Yank’s labor benefits on two levels. Mildred literally profits from Yank’s labor while on the ship, but the reader also learns that the ship belongs to the company which Mildred’s family owns - and therefore she (by extension) owns Yank’s labor.
The position of the cruise goers is highly contrasted with against that of the laborer. A key figure representative of the bourgeoisie is Mildred Douglas. She expresses a need to tour the workings of the ship, and it is during Scene III that she (dressed in a clean white dress) descends to the ship’s bulks and encounters Yank and the barbarity of his conditions and role that her style of living necessitates. Her repulsion of the image of the laborer nearly causes her faint and she is quickly removed from the hellish stokehole. She is horrified by his animal like face, her reaction is shocking to hurtful to him and he lashes out at her angrily. As she is being taken away she likens him to a filthy beast. The final scene of the play reveals Yank at the zoo in front of the gorilla exhibit. He feels akin to these creatures who are brutish and wild and are confined because of the very characteristics which are essential to their identity. Yank concludes that he is truly like them, beast like -a “hairy ape” - who must be caged. Yank’s ideology of being bound by the characteristics of your identity is an ideology which “only need to be ‘interpreted’ to discover the reality of the world behind their imaginary representation of that world (ideology=illusion/allusion)” (Althusser, 693).
According to Marxist philosophy, Yank’s belief referenced early in the play, that “we run de whole woiks. All de rich guys dat tink dey’re somep’n, dey ain’t nothing!” would be viewed as partially true. Marx believed in the notion that there was a reciprocal relationship between the proletariat and the bourgeois, in which the worker produced for the benefit of the owner, but the owner gave the wage earner identity and value through their work. Marx would also argue that the worker would not be able to produce anything without the raw materials provided to him by the owner. The owner owned all of the laborers hourly production, the resources used in production and therefore was the sole beneficiary of the finished product. But Yank’s character grasped a fundamental Marxist ideal that the bourgeois class is only able to exisist because of the labor base which provides its wealth. Yank is correct in his belief that without the production and symbiosis of the relationship between the two classes, both fail.

Works Cited
Althusser, Louis. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses.” Literary Theory: An Anthology. Eds. Julie Rivkin and Michael Rivkin. Malden: Blackwell, 2004. 693-702

O’Neill, Eugene. “The Hairy Ape.” The Heath Anthology of American Literature. Vol. D. Ed. Lauter, Paul. Boston: Houghton, 2006. 1177-1208.

Marx, Karl. “Grundisse.” Literary Theory: An Anthology. Eds. Julie Rivkin and Michael Rivkin. Malden: Blackwell, 2004. 650-652.

Marx, Karl. “Wage Labor and Capital” Literary Theory: An Anthology. Eds. Julie Rivkin and Michael Rivkin. Malden: Blackwell, 2004. 659-664

Disrupted Formation of I: Deafening the World

Freud believed that the primary years were the most crucial to the normative development of an individual. He concluded that any interruption or disruption of this process would cause serious neurosis. An example of this of symptom manifestation would be the child whose discovery of the pleasure of the genitals might later become extremely repressive or alternately extremely promiscuous. Freud believed that children were sexual beings from birth and that these stages, oral, anal and genital, were necessary for normal development. Freud theorized that children initially identified with the mother(er) figure and that the child’s sense of identity was intertwined with this figure. The child typically finds their physical and emotional needs met by this figure in the earliest phases of development. Because the mother is attentive to the father the child may either fear the father, or in most cases the young male child will eventually shift their attention seeking to their father who they emulate. This theory is known as the Oedipal Complex and Freud believed that it was a rite of passage in development and a necessary segue to establishing an adult identity.

The song "Jeremy" by Pearl Jam explores the issues of Freud's Oedipal Complex and Lacan's theories of the formation of I by exploring the story of a child' whose passage through these stages has been disrupted. The lines: "Daddy didn’t give affection/And that boy was something mommy wouldn’t wear” speaks directly to ideas Freud posited in the Oedipal Complex. In the song, Jeremy seeks attention/physical comfort from the mother figure, but is rejected. Jeremy then tries to gain attention from his father who also rejects him. In Introduction: Strangers to Ourselves: Psychoanalyses, Rivkin and Ryan document the importance of the creation of the identity by writing that “as each child grows and enters first family then society, he or she learns to repress those sexual impulses as well as an initially grandiose sense of self to the demands of life with others. (Rivkin 381).” This inability to bond appropriately with the parent figures in Freud’s proscribed stages causes an inability to relate and his eventual lashing (failure to repress sexual and aggressive impulses) out against society. The songs direct reference to the child’s action, “gnashed his teeth/and bit the recess lady’s breast” would indicate that the mother/child fractured or reached the ultimate disconnect resulting in the child’s oral fixation and misplaced sexual and aggressive impulses by way of gnashing the teeth and biting. The object of the biting further corroborates the idea that there is reaction formation in the very act of lashing out at the physical comfort of the breast which is what he ultimately desires.
Jeremy’s disrupted development is also apparent in his distorted, yet grandiose, image of himself as demonstrated by the child produced artwork – Jeremy’s artwork – self imagining himself as a victorious “King Jeremy” bathed in sunlight and master of all he surveys. In “The Mirror Stage” Lacan discusses the stagesof development for the perception of image – which begins as an extension of the motherer figure and gradually transforms from the specular I to the social I. Lacan states that the signifigance of the “moment that decisively tips the whole of human knowledge into mediatization through the desire of the other, constitutes its objects in an “abstract” which every instinctual thrust constitutes a danger, even though it should correspond to a natural maturation.” (Lacan, 445). Essentially Lacan argues that the child begins as a mirror image that mimics the mother, and morphs later into the Social I and later a Symbolic I figure. In the sogn Jeremy we can clearly see that the child’s development has been disrupted resulting in a fractured image or sense of identity. Socially Jeremy is viewed by peers as a “harmless little fuck” who has no ability to assert himself or makes needs and demands known. It is only when Jeremy is pushed through taunting and abuse into his symbolic vision of himself as “King Jeremy” regresses to the state of responding to the id exclusively, losing restraint and acting on primitive, instinctual desires and revealing the “madenss that deafens the world with its sound and fury” (Lacan, 445).

Works Cited


Rivkin, Julie and Ryan, Michael. "Introduction: Strangers to Ourselves: Psychoanalysis." Literary Theory: An Anthology. 2nd Ed. Eds. Julie Rivkin and Michael Ryan. Malden: Blackwell, 2004.


Lacan, Jacques. "The Mirror Stage as Formative of the Function of the I as Revealed in Psychoanalytical Experience." Literary Theory: An Anthology. 2nd Ed. Eds. Julie Rivkin and Michael Ryan. Malden: Blackwell, 2004.



Title: Pearl Jam - Jeremy lyrics


At home
Drawing pictures
Of mountain tops
With him on top
Lemon yellow sun
Arms raised in a V
Dead lay in pools of maroon below
Daddy didn't give attention
To the fact that mommy didn't care
King Jeremy the wicked
Ruled his world
Jeremy spoke in class today
Jeremy spoke in class today
Clearly I remember
Pickin' on the boy
Seemed a harmless little fuck
But we unleashed a lion
Gnashed his teeth
And bit the recess lady's breast
How could i forget
He hit me with a surprise left
My jaw left hurtin
Dropped wide open
Just like the day
Like the day i heard
Daddy didn't give affection
And the boy was something mommy wouldn't wear
King jeremy the wicked
Ruled his world
Jeremy spoke in class today
Jeremy spoke in class today
Try to forget this...
Try to erase this...
From the blackboard.

Sorry couldn't embed the video because it had been disabled, but it can be viewed here: